Reading Debate Cards
Understanding what every field in a debate card means.
Each debate card represents one complete council analysis. Here's what every field means.
Header
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Token symbol | The asset that was analysed (e.g. BTC, ETH, SOL) |
| Final call | The council's verdict — BULLISH, BEARISH, or NEUTRAL |
| Agreement | How aligned the agents were (see below) |
| Conviction score | Weighted average conviction across all agents, 0–100 |
| Timestamp | When this debate ran |
Agreement Levels
| Level | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Unanimous | All agents agree on the same stance |
| Majority | Most agents agree, at least one dissents |
| Split | Agents are divided — no clear majority |
A split result with high conviction scores is particularly interesting: agents strongly believe different things. This often signals elevated uncertainty or an inflection point.
Agent Matrix
The matrix below the consensus shows each agent's individual verdict:
- Stance — long (bullish), short (bearish), or neutral
- Conviction — how strongly the agent holds that view, 0–100
- Practice position — a hypothetical trade: direction, size %, entry reference, invalidation level, and target
- Reasoning trail — the chain of tool calls and findings the agent used to reach its conclusion
The Contrarian
The Contrarian is highlighted separately. It doesn't give an independent view — it stress-tests the emerging consensus leader (the agent with the highest conviction in the current debate). Check the Contrarian's reasoning trail to see which specific claims it challenged.
Outlier
If one agent dissented from the majority, their name appears as the Outlier with a brief explanation of why they took a different stance. This is worth reading — the outlier sometimes identifies risks the majority missed.